These comments are direct quotations from the Hansard
documents.
Hundreds of Jobs Being Affected
Mr. Stephen Harper
(Leader of the Opposition, Canadian Alliance): Mr. Speaker, I want to
ask the government about the mad cow situation which we know is of grave
concern to all sides of the House. Hundreds of animals are being destroyed
or quarantined as is necessary to ensure containment and to ensure the
quality of Canadian beef, but in the process hundreds of jobs of ordinary
Canadians are being affected.
In the case of the SARS crisis in Toronto, the government acted quickly to
relax EI rules to waive the EI waiting period. Would the government be
prepared to do the same thing for Canadian workers affected by the mad cow
crisis?
Right Hon. Jean Chrétien (Prime Minister, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, we
were not very happy when we saw that problem develop. I would like to
congratulate the ministers and officials of the Department of Agriculture
in Ottawa and in Alberta for the diligence they have shown in coming to
grips with the problem.
We had some good news in that there was only one cow affected in that
operation. There is some work still going on and there is the question of
the consequences for the people affected. Of course, the Minister of Human
Resources Development will see what she can do in order to be just for
these people as was done for the people of Toronto.
Mr. Stephen Harper (Leader of the Opposition, Canadian Alliance):
Mr. Speaker, I thank the Prime Minister for that consideration.
There is another way the Canadian government can help. Canada has an
agreement with a number of countries, including Australia and New Zealand,
to import a fixed amount of beef, but in the past we have allowed into the
country some extra beef through an over-quota system.
Now that Canadian beef is blocked at the borders, will the government
agree to temporarily suspend the over-quota import of foreign beef and
allow Canadian producers to fill the entire demand of the Canadian market?
Hon. Pierre Pettigrew (Minister for International Trade, Lib.): Mr.
Speaker, I thank the leader of the official opposition for the very
pertinent question. We have already been working very closely on this
issue with the Canadian industry.
I understand that we actually import from three countries at this time:
Uruguay, Argentina and New Zealand. They are special products and we are
in close touch with the industry to ensure that we do what is in the best
interests of our industry at this time.
Mr. Dick Proctor (Palliser, NDP): Mr. Speaker, besides health
concerns Canadians see crises like mad cow and SARS as big time job losses
in the country. Our Prime Minister may see crisis as an excuse for dining
out but putting food on the table is a real concern for families, even if
it is only a photo opportunity for him, particularly meat plant workers
who cannot even afford a temporary loss of work.
The government has ignored the hospitality workers in Toronto with the EI
benefit program. I am asking if the Prime Minister will deliver for meat
plant workers and wave the waiting period as a result of the mad cow
layoffs?
[Translation]
Ms. Diane St-Jacques (Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Human
Resources Development, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, we are taking the risk of
job loss in the beef industry very seriously, and the department will
continue to monitor the situation very closely.
If there are layoffs in meat packing plants or in related areas of the
beef industry, workers will be eligible for employment insurance and can
count on it.
[English]
Mr. Dick Proctor (Palliser, NDP): Mr. Speaker, workers in crisis
deserve more than a prime ministerial happy meal. SARS has again hit
Toronto, with the hospitality industry already in crisis and reeling from
the first one.
The Liberal response: Not a penny in compensation for the hospitality
sector, just an ad campaign that apparently does not even mention the word
Toronto in the ad.
Why will the Prime Minister spend $100 million to glorify the past when he
will not spend one penny to protect hospitality workers as a result of
these emergencies?
Right Hon. Jean Chrétien (Prime Minister, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, I
think the member of Parliament just made a remark about the fact that I
went to have a dinner the other day to show that Canadian beef was good.
I received a letter from Premier Klein, who said:
On behalf of the Government of Alberta and Alberta's cattle producers, I
am writing to thank you for your public show of confidence in Alberta's
and Canada's beef industry. Your steak lunch in Ottawa on Wednesday
received a tremendous amount of coverage across Canada, and it means a
great deal to our province...
He kept on and on, congratulating the Minister of Agriculture, so I think
I will accept that.
Mr. Monte Solberg (Medicine Hat, Canadian Alliance): Mr. Speaker,
these are the facts regarding mad cow disease in Canada.
Exactly one cow has been found to have mad cow disease. That animal never
entered the food chain. Not one of the other animals in that herd showed
any signs of the disease. A dozen other herds with links to this diseased
animal have been quarantined. Not a single animal in any of those herds
has shown any signs of mad cow disease.
However despite these facts, the U.S. border remains closed to Canadian
beef and cattle.
I assume the minister has been in touch with his counterpart in the U.S.
My question is this. What specific criteria does Canada now have to meet
in order for the Americans to open up the border again?
Hon. Lyle Vanclief (Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food, Lib.):
Mr. Speaker, I have had at least seven conversations with my counterpart
in the United States in the last number of days.
The hon. member is correct in the statistics he gives, except that the
trace out being done in those quarantined herds, the tracing ahead of the
animals that left that farm and back from where that cow came, is not yet
complete.
The work we have done so far definitely proves there is only one cow and,
no, it did not get in the food chain. We need to complete that, and that
work is ongoing at this time. We are very fortunate that we have the best
food surveillance system in the world and when we show--
The Speaker: The hon. member for Medicine Hat.
Mr. Monte Solberg (Medicine Hat, Canadian Alliance): Mr. Speaker,
2,400 workers in my riding alone, at meat packers, are affected by this.
Cattle feeders are on the verge of going bankrupt, and all their suppliers
are in deep trouble right now. This is an extraordinarily serious issue.
What I want to know from the minister is this. First, how long will it
take for that trace out to finish up. Second, what criteria have the
Americans specified that we need to meet in order for them to open up the
border again so we can start to export our beef?
Hon. Lyle Vanclief (Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food, Lib.):
Mr. Speaker, they have not given a specific criteria other than they say
that they want, and I believe them, this border opened as quickly as we
do. They know the integration of the beef industry between Canada and the
United States. They know there are over half a million head of Canadian
cattle in feedlots and in breeding herds in the United States. It is
critical to them as well.
What they want is what we want, and that is all the scientific proof we
possibly can get that this was only one cow. We are well on the way to do
that. It takes time to do that scientifically. Food safety and safety are
number one. We will base it on science and demonstrate that, not only to
the United States but to the world.
Mr. Louis Plamondon (Bas-Richelieu—Nicolet—Bécancour, BQ): Mr.
Speaker, the Quebec government has implemented an exemplary tracking
system that ensures it will not suffer Alberta's current problems with mad
cow disease. Moreover, when this disease hit Britain, the entire beef
industry in Europe was not subject to a ban. The minister should consider
using this system.
The Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food should learn from what Alberta
is going through and adopt the UPA's solution, which is to regionalize
agricultural and safety practices, thereby limiting the ban's impact to
local areas instead of endangering the Canadian beef industry as a whole.
[English]
Hon. Lyle Vanclief (Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food, Lib.):
Mr. Speaker, the Canadian cattle industry, as I said a few minutes ago, is
not only integrated with the United States but it is integrated across our
country.
Canadian genetics of cattle move from province to province across the
country, and the programs and the system of surveillance based on food
safety and science needs to be in place for the whole country.
[Translation]
Mr. Louis Plamondon (Bas-Richelieu—Nicolet—Bécancour, BQ): Mr.
Speaker, I think that the minister's answer is, in fact, the problem.
I asked him a clear question. Since Quebec's prevention system works
extremely well, what is the federal government waiting for to implement
it, insofar as possible within its own areas of jurisdiction, to reassure
importing countries, so that Quebec producers can resume exports?
[English]
Hon. Lyle Vanclief (Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food, Lib.):
Mr. Speaker, the hon. member knows that Quebec is part of Canada, and the
Canadian Food Inspection Agency is a federal inspection agency that does
the inspection in Quebec, as it does in every province, for all meat that
leaves Quebec to other provinces or other parts of the world.
We all benefit in Canada from the best food inspection systems in the
world, and it is there for all Canadians in all provinces.
Mr. Rick Borotsik (Brandon—Souris, PC): Mr. Speaker, mad cow
disease along with the new cases of SARS have delivered a one, two
crippling punch to the Canadian economy. What Canadians needed was
somebody to instill confidence, someone to demonstrate real leadership.
Eating one steak does not cut it. People's livelihoods are threatened. The
future of a $30 billion industry is in jeopardy.
My question is for the Prime Minister. What kind of compensation package,
what kind of support payments will be in place for producers, truckers,
auction houses and packing plants?
Right Hon. Jean Chrétien (Prime Minister, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, we
have the problem of mad cow which has been dealt with by the Minister of
Agriculture very effectively. Now there will be necessarily some
consequences for some people and we will see what we can do.
However, his big attack on the economy of Canada, I would like to tell the
hon. member that the G8 has asked the Prime Minister of Canada to make a
presentation on economic performance because Canada is the one country in
the G8 that is having the best economic performance of all the
industrialized nations.
Mr. Gary Schellenberger (Perth--Middlesex, PC): Mr. Speaker, the
case of mad cow disease is having a devastating impact on beef farmers
across Canada. Better Beef, a packing plant in Guelph, announced that it
has just laid off 100 people.
Earlier a question was asked about providing an EI program for workers
affected by mad cow disease similar to the one created for SARS. The
government's response was to continue to monitor the situation. That is
simply not good enough. Will the government provide real assistance? Yes
or no.
[Translation]
Ms. Diane St-Jacques (Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Human
Resources Development, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, as I said earlier, we are
taking the situation in the beef industry very seriously, and workers can
count on the employment insurance plan if they lose their jobs.
Moreover, if the situation warrants, those in charge of employment
insurance can sign a worksharing agreement. The Government of Canada is
there for Canadian workers and is working very hard to find solutions to
this difficult situation.
|