These comments are direct quotations from the Hansard
documents.
What Are US Demands
Mr.
Howard Hilstrom (Selkirk—Interlake, Canadian Alliance): Mr. Speaker,
the prices paid for live cattle in Canada are determined by our offshore
customers and what they are willing to pay. The United States is our
biggest foreign customer, so reopening the border to exports is the key to
getting our beef industry back on its feet.
What specific investigative steps and changes to regulations, if any, is
the United States demanding before our beef exports will once again flow
across the border?
Hon. Lyle Vanclief (Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food, Lib.):
Mr. Speaker, the United States has not made any specific demands or
requests. What it is asking is the same as we are asking here and what we
are seeking here. It wants to see the results of the tremendous tracking
and tracing system we have.
I am pleased to say that the second test on the case herd has now come
back and, as the first test did, it is all negative. That means there were
no animals in that ranch with BSE.
Mr. Howard Hilstrom (Selkirk—Interlake, Canadian Alliance): Mr.
Speaker, while this investigation continues, farmers, ranchers and
livestock exporters are losing $11 million a day. This is hurting our farm
families.
This investigation, for example, has DNA testing of the McRae family farm.
That testing has been going on for about four or five days to this point.
When can we expect to see that testing on that specific indexed cow so
that those animals can be depopulated?
Hon. Lyle Vanclief (Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food, Lib.):
Mr. Speaker, the hon. member is getting very specific. I believe he had an
opportunity in standing committee to ask that question this morning.
I am not a scientist, but it is my understanding that DNA testing does
take a few days. That is the tracking and tracing system we have so we can
see if we can find other animals that are genetically related to the cow
found to have BSE, which was taken out of the food chain. If there are
other herd mates of that, we can test those animals as well. We have that
system in Canada. Most countries do not have that.
Mr. Louis Plamondon (Bas-Richelieu—Nicolet—Bécancour, BQ): Mr.
Speaker, Quebec beef producers are asking why they are having to bear the
brunt of a ban on their exports to the U.S. when there has been not a
single case of mad cow disease found in Quebec. Yet the Canadian Food
Inspection Agency's ban on American poultry with Newcastle disease was
limited to just four U.S. states.
Can the Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food explain to us why he accepts
the principle of regionalization in connection with diseased American
poultry but not Quebec beef?
[English]
Hon. Lyle Vanclief (Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food, Lib.):
Mr. Speaker, there is a significant difference between Newcastle disease
in poultry and BSE. We are looking to find the cause of BSE in the one cow
that was found in Canada. With Newcastle disease it is easier. We know the
cause. We can isolate the cause of Newcastle disease and we can
regionalize it because the cause is known. That process is recognized as
well by the Office International des Epizooties.
[Translation]
Mr. Louis Plamondon (Bas-Richelieu—Nicolet—Bécancour, BQ): Mr.
Speaker, we are just inches away from having mad cow disease waved as a
symbol of Canadian unity.
I am asking the minister to show some responsibility and acknowledge that,
with regionalization, only the affected region would be covered by the
ban, which would prevent needlessly penalizing the entire beef industry
across Canada.
[English]
Hon. Lyle Vanclief (Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food, Lib.): Mr.
Speaker, the Office International des Epizooties does not have a provision
for regionalizing BSE. It has not been successfully done in any country in
the world. There is no precedent on that.
As I said yesterday, the beef industry is very much integrated in Canada.
Cattle have originated in every province in Canada and as well, Canadian
cattle are in the United States. This is a much different situation than
the one referred to as Newcastle disease in poultry and therefore has to
be treated in a different way.
|